Question 1:The Problem

  Did the report state the research problem and/or research questions? Is the scope of the project appropriate? Was the approach to integration described, and was the approach appropriate?

 

Question 2: Search Strategy

  Did the report describe criteria for selecting primary studies, and are the criteria defensible?

  Were the bibliographic databases used by the reviewers identified, and are they appropriate and comprehensive? Were key words identified?

  Did the reviewers use supplementary efforts to identify relevant studies?

 

Question 3: The Sample

  Did the search strategy yield a good sample of studies?

  If a primary study report was lacking key information, did reviewers attempt to contact the original researchers for additional information?

 

Question 4: Quality Appraisal

  Did the reviewers appraise the quality of the primary studies? Did they use a well-defined set of criteria or a validated quality appraisal scale?

  Did two or more people do the appraisals, and was interrater reliability reported?

  Was quality information used effectively in selecting studies or analyzing results?

 

Question 5: Data Extraction

  Was adequate information extracted about the study design, sample characteristics, and study findings?

  Were steps taken to enhance the integrity of the data set (e.g., Were two or more people used to extract and record information for analysis)?

 

Question 6: Data Analysis—General

  Did the reviewers explain their method of pooling and integrating the data?

  Were tables, figures, and text used effectively to summarize findings?

 

Question 7: Data Analysis—Quantitative

  If a meta-analysis was not performed, was there adequate justification for using narrative integration? If a meta-analysis was performed, was this justifiable?

  For meta-analyses, did the report describe how effect sizes were computed?

  Was heterogeneity of effects assessed? Was the decision to use a random effects model versus a fixed effects model sound? Were subgroup analyses undertaken—or was the absence of subgroup analyses justified?

 

Question 8: Conclusions

  Did the reviewers draw reasonable conclusions about their results and about the quality of evidence relating to the research question?

  Were limitations of the review/synthesis noted?

  Were implications for nursing and health care practice and further research clearly stated?

"Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us"
Use the following coupon
FIRST15

Order Now
CategoryUncategorized
Write a comment:

*

Your email address will not be published.

The focus of this assignment is three-fold: 1) Examine key components of the IOM The Future of Nursing Report Brief, 2) Identify opportunities to promote inter professional collaboration, and 3) Reflect on the future of nursing. 

Please post a response specific to all components outlined in A, B, and C. 

 

A1.  From reading the IOM The Future of Nursing Report Briefwhich one of the 4 key messages speak to you and WHY?

A2.  From Chapter 3 of the IOM Report: Transforming Practice, list one of the Barriers to Transforming Practiceas identified in the reading.

A3. After identifying the one Barrier, describe a strategy, that you have seen implemented in your work setting or you have seen implemented in the media, to address the identified Barrier.

 

B1, B2, B3.  Describe one example each of how 1) theory, 2) research, and 3) evidence based practice promote interprofessional collaboration in the your  practice setting from a nursing perspective.

 

C.  From all of your reading in this module, identify two future concerns/issues/directions  you anticipate for nursing in the future. 

C1.  What are your two areas?

C2.  Why do you believe each will be an issue for nursing in the next 5 to 10 years?

 

 

 

 

 

1) IOM The Future of Nursing Report Brief at http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2010/The-Future-of-Nursing/Future%20of%20Nursing%202010%20Report%20Brief.pdf (Links to an external site.),

2) IOM The Future of Nursing Chapter 3 Transforming Practice at https://www.nap.edu/read/12956/chapter/8?term=chapter+3 (Links to an external site.)

3) Robert Wood Johnson initiative related to the IOM report:  http://thefutureofnursing.org/recommendations

 

 

 

 

IF YOU SHOULD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE FEEL FREE TO MESSAGE ME

 

"Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us"
Use the following coupon
FIRST15

Order Now
CategoryUncategorized
Write a comment:

*

Your email address will not be published.

A1.  From reading the IOM The Future of Nursing Report Briefwhich one of the 4 key messages speak to you and WHY?

 

A2.  From Chapter 3 of the IOM Report: Transforming Practice, list one of the Barriers to Transforming Practiceas identified in the reading.

 

A3. After identifying the one Barrier, describe a strategy, that you have seen implemented in your work setting or you have seen implemented in the media, to address the identified Barrier.

 

B)  Describe one example each of how 1) theory, 2) research, and 3) evidence based practice promote interprofessional collaboration in the your  practice setting from a nursing perspective.

 

C.  Identify two future concerns/issues/directions  you anticipate for nursing in the future. 

     C1.  What are your two areas?

     C2.  Why do you believe each will be an issue for nursing in the next 5 to 10                         years?

"Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us"
Use the following coupon
FIRST15

Order Now
CategoryUncategorized
Write a comment:

*

Your email address will not be published.

For order inquiries        1-800-700-6200

Hi there! Click one of our representatives below and we will get back to you as soon as possible.

Chat with us on WhatsApp